Comparison of the Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Drug-Eluting Balloons in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis (from the RIBS IV and V Randomized Clinical Trials) (Registro nro. 17691)
[ vista simple ]
| 000 -CABECERA | |
|---|---|
| Campo de control de longitud fija | nab a22 7a 4500 |
| 003 - IDENTIFICADOR DEL NÚMERO DE CONTROL | |
| Campo de control | PC17691 |
| 005 - FECHA Y HORA DE LA ÚLTIMA TRANSACCIÓN | |
| Campo de control | 20231017121432.0 |
| 008 - CÓDIGOS DE INFORMACIÓN DE LONGITUD FIJA | |
| Campo de control de longitud fija | 231017b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 040 ## - FUENTE DE LA CATALOGACIÓN | |
| Centro transcriptor | H12O |
| 041 ## - CÓDIGO DE LENGUA | |
| Código de lengua del texto/banda sonora o título independiente | eng |
| 100 ## - PUNTO DE ACCESO PRINCIPAL - NOMBRE DE PERSONA | |
| 9 (RLIN) | 1241 |
| Nombre de persona | Velázquez Martín, María Teresa |
| Término indicativo de función | Cardiología |
| 245 00 - MENCIÓN DE TÍTULO | |
| Título | Comparison of the Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Drug-Eluting Balloons in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis (from the RIBS IV and V Randomized Clinical Trials) |
| Tipo de material | [artículo] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Nombre del editor distribuidor etc. | The American journal of cardiology, |
| Fecha de publicación distribución etc. | 2016 |
| 300 ## - DESCRIPCIÓN FÍSICA | |
| Extensión | 117(4):546-54. |
| 500 ## - NOTA GENERAL | |
| Nota general | Formato Vancouver: Alfonso F, Pérez Vizcayno MJ, García Del Blanco B, García Touchard A, Masotti M, López Minguez JR et al; Restenosis Intra-Stent: Drug-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent (RIBS-IV and V Studies) Investigators (Under the auspices of the Interventional Cardiology Working Group of the Spanish Society of Cardiology). Comparison of the Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Drug-Eluting Balloons in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis (from the RIBS IV and V Randomized Clinical Trials). Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 15;117(4):546-54. |
| 501 ## - NOTA DE “CON” | |
| Nota de "Con" | PMID: 26725102 |
| 504 ## - NOTA DE BIBLIOGRAFÍA; ETC. | |
| Nota de bibliografía etc. | Contiene 27 referencias |
| 520 ## - NOTA DE SUMARIO; ETC. | |
| Sumario etc. | Treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenge. This study sought to compare the efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) and drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) with paclitaxel in patients with ISR. A pooled analysis of the Restenosis Intra-Stent of Drug-Eluting Stents: Drug-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent (RIBS IV) and Restenosis Intra-Stent of Bare-Metal Stents: Drug-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent (RIBS V) randomized trials was performed using patient-level data. In both trials, EESs were compared with DEBs in patients with ISR (RIBS V included 189 patients with bare-metal ISR; RIBS IV included 309 patients with drug-eluting ISR). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical in both trials. A total of 249 patients were allocated to EES and 249 to DEB. Clinical follow-up at 1 year was obtained in all (100%) patients and late angiography (median 249 days) in 91% of eligible patients. Compared with patients treated with DEBs, patients treated with EESs obtained better short-term results (postprocedural minimal lumen diameter 2.28 ± 0.5 vs 2.12 ± 0.4 mm, p <0.0001). At follow-up, patients treated with EESs had larger in-segment minimal lumen diameter (primary end point 2.16 ± 0.7 vs 1.88 ± 0.6 mm, p <0.0001; absolute mean difference 0.28 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16 to 0.40) and net lumen gain (1.33 ± 0.6 vs 1.00 ± 0.7 mm, p <0.0001) and had lower %diameter stenosis (19 ± 21% vs 28 ± 22%, p <0.0001) and binary restenosis rate (8.7% vs 15.7%, p = 0.02). Consistent results were observed in the in-lesion analysis. No interactions were found between the underlying stent type and treatment effects. At 1-year clinical follow-up, the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization was significantly reduced in the EES arm (8.8% vs 14.5%, p = 0.03; hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.94) mainly driven by a lower need for target vessel revascularization (6% vs 12.4%, p = 0.01, hazard ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.86). This pooled analysis of the RIBS IV and RIBS V randomized trials demonstrates the superiority of EES over DEB in the treatment of patients with ISR. |
| 710 ## - PUNTO DE ACCESO ADICIONAL - NOMBRE DE ENTIDAD | |
| 9 (RLIN) | 119 |
| Nombre de entidad o nombre de jurisdicción como elemento inicial | Servicio de Cardiología |
| 856 ## - LOCALIZACIÓN Y ACCESO ELECTRÓNICOS | |
| Identificador Uniforme del Recurso (URI) | http://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/1/pc17691.pdf |
| Acceso | Solicitar documento |
| 942 ## - ENTRADA PARA ELEMENTOS AGREGADOS (KOHA) | |
| Fuente de clasificación o esquema de ordenación en estanterías | |
| Koha [por defecto] tipo de item | Artículo |
| Suprimido en OPAC | Público |
| Suprimido | Estado de pérdida | Fuente de clasificación o esquema de ordenación en estanterías | Estropeado | No para préstamo | Localización permanente | Localización actual | Fecha de adquisición | Signatura completa | Fecha última consulta | Fecha del precio de reemplazo | Tipo de item de Koha |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre | Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre | 2023-10-17 | PC17691 | 2023-10-17 | 2023-10-17 | Artículo |
