International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry: A Worldwide Collaborative Description and Preliminary Outcomes. [artículo]
Por: Galindo Izquierdo, Alberto [Obstetricia y Ginecología].
Colaborador(es): Servicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología.
Tipo de material: ArtículoEditor: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2015Descripción: 66(4):388-99.Recursos en línea: Solicitar documento Resumen: Background: Invasive fetal cardiac intervention (FCI) has been reported in single-institution series, promoting technical and physiologic success. Objectives: This study describes the creation of an international registry of cases presenting for FCI, intended to compile technical and outcome data from a multicenter cohort. Methods: For this initial analysis, the entire database of the International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry (IFCIR) was queried for details of diagnoses, procedures, and outcomes. Maternal-fetal dyads from January 2001 through June 2014 were included. Results: Eighteen institutions submitted data by data harvest. Of 370 cases entered, 245 underwent FCI: 100 aortic valvuloplasties from a previous single-center report (excluded from additional reporting here), an additional 86 aortic and 16 pulmonary valvuloplasties, 37 atrial septal cases, and 6 unclassified cases. FCI did not appear to affect overall survival to hospital discharge. Among live-born infants with a fetal diagnosis of aortic stenosis/evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome, more than twice as many were discharged with biventricular circulation after successful FCI versus those meeting institutional criteria but without any or successful FCI (42.8% vs. 19.4%, respectively). When fetal deaths were counted as treatment failures, the percentages were similar: biventricular circulation at discharge was 31.3% versus 18.5% for those discharged with univentricular palliation. Survival to discharge for live-born fetuses with atrial restriction was similar to that of those undergoing technically successful versus unsuccessful FCI (63.6% vs. 46.7%, respectively), although criteria for diagnosis were nonuniform. Conclusions: We describe the contents of the IFCIR and present post-natal data to suggest potential benefit to fetal therapy among pregnancies considered for possible intervention and support proposals for additional work.Tipo de ítem | Ubicación actual | Signatura | Estado | Fecha de vencimiento |
---|---|---|---|---|
Artículo | PC17111 (Navegar estantería) | Disponible |
Navegando Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Estantes Cerrar el navegador de estanterías
Formato Vancouver:
Moon Grady AJ, Morris SA, Belfort M, Chmait R, Dangel J, Devlieger R et al; International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry. International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry: A Worldwide Collaborative Description and Preliminary Outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jul 28;66(4):388-99.
PMID: 26205597
Contiene 33 referencias
Background: Invasive fetal cardiac intervention (FCI) has been reported in single-institution series, promoting technical and physiologic success.
Objectives: This study describes the creation of an international registry of cases presenting for FCI, intended to compile technical and outcome data from a multicenter cohort.
Methods: For this initial analysis, the entire database of the International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry (IFCIR) was queried for details of diagnoses, procedures, and outcomes. Maternal-fetal dyads from January 2001 through June 2014 were included.
Results: Eighteen institutions submitted data by data harvest. Of 370 cases entered, 245 underwent FCI: 100 aortic valvuloplasties from a previous single-center report (excluded from additional reporting here), an additional 86 aortic and 16 pulmonary valvuloplasties, 37 atrial septal cases, and 6 unclassified cases. FCI did not appear to affect overall survival to hospital discharge. Among live-born infants with a fetal diagnosis of aortic stenosis/evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome, more than twice as many were discharged with biventricular circulation after successful FCI versus those meeting institutional criteria but without any or successful FCI (42.8% vs. 19.4%, respectively). When fetal deaths were counted as treatment failures, the percentages were similar: biventricular circulation at discharge was 31.3% versus 18.5% for those discharged with univentricular palliation. Survival to discharge for live-born fetuses with atrial restriction was similar to that of those undergoing technically successful versus unsuccessful FCI (63.6% vs. 46.7%, respectively), although criteria for diagnosis were nonuniform.
Conclusions: We describe the contents of the IFCIR and present post-natal data to suggest potential benefit to fetal therapy among pregnancies considered for possible intervention and support proposals for additional work.
No hay comentarios para este ejemplar.