000 | nab a22 7a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c16568 _d16568 |
||
003 | PC16568 | ||
005 | 20210811103853.0 | ||
008 | 210802b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _cH12O | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
100 |
_9882 _aCastellano, Daniel _eOncología Médica |
||
245 | 0 | 0 |
_aRandomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of sunitinib plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in progressive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. _h[artículo] |
260 |
_bJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, _c2014 |
||
300 | _a32(2):76-82. | ||
500 | _aFormato Vancouver: Michaelson MD, Oudard S, Ou YC, Sengeløv L, Saad F, Houede N et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of sunitinib plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in progressive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan 10;32(2):76-82. | ||
501 | _aPMID: 24323035 | ||
504 | _aContiene 48 referencias | ||
520 | _aPurpose: We evaluated angiogenesis-targeted sunitinib therapy in a randomized, double-blind trial of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients and methods: Men with progressive mCRPC after docetaxel-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive sunitinib 37.5 mg/d continuously or placebo. Patients also received oral prednisone 5 mg twice daily. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS). Two interim analyses were planned. Results: Overall, 873 patients were randomly assigned to receive sunitinib (n = 584) or placebo (n = 289). The independent data monitoring committee stopped the study for futility after the second interim analysis. After a median overall follow-up of 8.7 months, median OS was 13.1 months and 11.8 months for sunitinib and placebo, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.914; 95% CI, 0.762 to 1.097; stratified log-rank test, P = .168). PFS was significantly improved in the sunitinib arm (median 5.6 v 4.1 months; HR, 0.725; 95% CI, 0.591 to 0.890; stratified log-rank test, P < .001). Toxicity and rates of discontinuations because of adverse events (AEs; 27% v 7%) were greater with sunitinib than placebo. The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs were fatigue (9% v 1%), asthenia (8% v 2%), and hand-foot syndrome (7% v 0%). Frequent treatment-emergent grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities were lymphopenia (20% v 11%), anemia (9% v 8%), and neutropenia (6% v < 1%). Conclusion: The addition of sunitinib to prednisone did not improve OS compared with placebo in docetaxel-refractory mCRPC. The role of antiangiogenic therapy in mCRPC remains investigational. | ||
710 |
_9303 _aServicio de Oncología Médica |
||
710 |
_9625 _aInstituto de Investigación imas12 |
||
856 |
_uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/1/pc16568.pdf _ySolicitar documento |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cART _n0 |