000			nab a22 7a 4500
999			_c16877 _d16877
003			PC16877
005			20220713062807.0
008			220527b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cH12O
041			_aspa
100			_91437 _aTejada Palacios, Pilar _eOftalmología
100			_9898 _aZarratea, L. _eOftalmología
100			_91848 _aMoral Pumarega, María Teresa _eNeonatología
100			_91783 _aCruz Bértolo, Javier de la _eEpidemiología Clínica
245	0	0	_aEstudio comparativo de RetCam II frente a oftalmoscopia binocular en el cribado de la retinopatía de la prematuridad. _h[artículo]
260			_bArchivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología, _c2015
300			_a90(8):373-8.
500			_aFormato Vancouver: Tejada Palacios P, Zarratea L, Moral M, de la Cruz Bértolo J. Estudio comparativo de RetCam II frente a oftalmoscopia binocular en el cribado de la retinopatía de la prematuridad. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2015 Aug;90(8):373-8.
501			_aPMID: 25817958
504			_aContiene 40 referencias
520			_aObjective: To determine the performance of RetCam vs. binocular ophthalmoscopy (BIO) in a screening program for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods: Observational comparative study with prospective data collection. Examinations with RetCam (n=169) were performed on 83 infants included in a screening program for ROP and stored for analysis at a later stage. An experienced ophthalmologist examined the ocular fundus with binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO). The RetCam images were assessed for the presence of ROP, zone, grade, and presence of plus disease. RetCam and BIO data were compared by visually to estimate sensitivity, specificity, positive (VPP) and negative (VPN) predictive values. Results: ROP disease was detected in 108 eyes with BIO, and in 74 with RetCam. Out of 306 eyes examined with RetCam, false negative results were found in 34 eyes, with no false positives. Sensitivity of RetCam exam vs. BIO was 0.68, and specificity was 0.99. Positive predictive value was 0.93 and negative predictive value was 0.85. All 34 ROP cases not detected with RetCam were in zone III or outer zone II. They were all mild and regressed spontaneously. No threshold ROP was missed with RetCam. Conclusion: Binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy is the reference method for the diagnosis of ROP. RetCam may be used as an alternative for ROP screening.
710			_9446 _aServicio de Pediatría-Neonatología
710			_9223 _aServicio de Oftalmología
710			_9625 _aInstituto de Investigación imas12
856			_uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/1/pc16877.pdf _ySolicitar documento
942			_2ddc _cART _n0