000			nab a22 7a 4500
999			_c17354 _d17354
003			PC17354
005			20230331133731.0
008			230331b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cH12O
041			_aeng
100			_91930 _aRomero Otero, Javier _eUrología
100			_91794 _aMedina Polo, José _eUrología
100			_92125 _aGarcía Gómez, Borja _eUrología
100			_9821 _aLora Pablos, David _eInstituto Investigación I+12
100			_91980 _aDuarte Ojeda, José Manuel _eUrología
100			_92594 _aGarcía González, Lucía _eUrología
100			_93241 _aGarcía Cruz, Eduardo _eUrología
100			_91692 _aRodríguez Antolín, Alfredo _eUrología
245	0	0	_aSemen Quality Assessment in Fertile Men in Madrid During the Last 3 Decades. _h[artículo]
260			_bUrology, _c2015
300			_a85(6):1333-8.
500			_aFormato Vancouver: Romero Otero J, Medina Polo J, García Gómez B, Lora Pablos D, Duarte Ojeda JM, García González L et al. Semen Quality Assessment in Fertile Men in Madrid During the Last 3 Decades. Urology. 2015 Jun;85(6):1333-8.
501			_aPMID: 25872697
504			_aContiene 27 referencias
520			_aObjective: To evaluate semen quality of men with proven fertility in Spain over the last 3 decades. Methods: We conduct a retrospective analysis of ejaculate samples of 992 men between 1985 and 2009. All patients had proven fertility as demonstrated by fathering at least 2 children and a semen analysis performed before they underwent vasectomy. A standardized procedure was used for the semen analysis. Semen volume, total sperm count, sperm concentration, motility, and percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa were assessed. Mean values were calculated by examining microscopic fields of 100 spermatozoa. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in all semen parameters analyzed. For the periods 1985-1990, 1990-2000, and 2000-2009, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) sperm concentration was 27.7 (22.97), 20.73 (14.79), and 20.18 (20.79) × 10(6) (P <.0001). The mean (SD) progressive motility for each period was 53.19 (20.35), 47.22 (15.84), and 40.57 (15.15; P <.0001). The mean (SD) normal-shaped spermatozoa for each period was 67.69 (10.24), 58.87 (14.67), and 51.02 (15.76; P <.0001). Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model showed that age had no significant effect in the variation of semen parameters at the cut-points analyzed, except for normal forms at percentile 25 (P = .001). Multivariate analysis revealed a trend for decline of semen in sperm concentration, progressive and nonprogressive motility, and the percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa (P = .001-.002). Conclusion: Over the last 3 decades, a decline in se
710			_9220 _aServicio de Urología
856			_uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/1/pc17354.pdf _ySolicitar documento
942			_2ddc _cART _n0