000			nab a22 7a 4500
999			_c17766 _d17766
003			PC17766
005			20231130125059.0
008			231130b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cH12O
041			_aeng
100			_91208 _aFernández Vázquez, Inmaculada _eAparato Digestivo
245	0	0	_aEfficacy and Safety of Therapy With Simeprevir and Sofosbuvir in Liver Transplant Recipients Infected by Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4: Cohort Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation Cohort. _h[artículo]
260			_bTransplantation proceedings, _c2016
300			_a48(9):3013-6.
500			_aFormato Vancouver: Sánchez Antolín G, Testillano M, Pascasio JM, Narváez Rodríguez I, Prieto M, Otero A et al; Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation Study Group Collaborating Group. Efficacy and Safety of Therapy With Simeprevir and Sofosbuvir in Liver Transplant Recipients Infected by Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4: Cohort Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation Cohort. Transplant Proc. 2016 Nov;48(9):3013-6.
501			_aPMID: 27932134
504			_aContiene 19 referencias
520			_aBackground: Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4 infection are poorly represented in clinical trials of 2nd-generation direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), and more data are needed to help guide treatment decisions. We still have even fewer data concerning liver transplant patients. Simeprevir (SIM) and sofosbuvir (SOF) combination is useful to treat this genotype. The aim of this study was to know the efficacy and safety of the combination SIM + SOF ± ribavirin (RBV) in a group of liver transplant patients with HCV genotype 4 infection in Spain in real life. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study, including 28 HCV genotype 4 patients from 11 liver transplant centers who were treated with SIM + SOF ± RBV. We included in the analysis demographic, clinical, and virologic data and details of serious adverse events (SAEs), including mortality rate 6 months after treatment. Results: All patients were male, mean age 52 ± 9.43 years, and 50% were IL28B CT and 37.5% TT; 46.42% of them were pretreated and 76.9 were null responders. Fibrosis stage 4 was found in 38.7% of patients; in 67.8% of those cases the diagnosis of fibrosis was made with the use of Fibroscan, in 21.4% by liver biopsy. The average Fibroscan was 13.86 KPa. The average Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of cirrhotic patients was 10.9 and the Child-Pugh score was A in 70%, B in 20%, and C in 10%. We included RBV in 75% of patients, and treatment duration was 12 weeks in all patients. The sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12) was 95.23%. There were no discontinuations due to SAEs, but the mortality rate at 6 months after treatment was 7.14%. All deceased patients were cirrhotic, Child C, and with an average MELD score of 20. Conclusions: The combination SIM + SOF ± RBV to treat HCV genotype 4 in liver transplant patients is an option with high rates of SVR12 and very safe, similarly to genotype 1. There was no treatment-related mortality, but when it is administered in advanced stages of fibrosis it may not be enough to prevent mortality associated with cirrhotic hepatitis C recurrence after transplantation.
710			_9273 _aServicio de Medicina del Aparato Digestivo
856			_uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/1/pc17766.pdf _ySolicitar documento
942			_2ddc _cART _n0