000			02716na a2200229 4500
003			PC3103
005			20180417112253.0
008			130622s2013 xxx||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cH12O
041			_aeng
100			_9655 _aAgüera Ortiz, Luis Fernando _ePsiquiatría
245	0	0	_aAdaptation into spanish of the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS) for assessing major depressive disorder from the patient's perspective. _h[artículo]
260			_bActas Españolas De Psiquiatría, _c2013
300			_a41(5):287-300.
500			_aFormato Vancouver: Agüera-Ortiz L, Montón C, Cuervo J, Medina E, Díaz-Cuervo H, Maurino J. Adaptation into Spanish of the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS) for assessing major depressive disorder from the patient's perspective. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2013 Sep-Oct;41(5):287-300.
501			_aPMID: 24096394
504			_aContiene 48 referencias
520			_aObjective: To adapt the CUDOS scale (Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale) into Spanish and to test its psychometrical properties in a sample of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: A two-step cross-sectional, multicenter validation study was conducted (linguistic adaptation into Spanish and psychometric validation). The study evaluated patients attended in Primary Care with a MDD diagnosis within the last 3 months (DSM-IV TR criteria). The following scales were administered: CUDOS, PRIME-MD (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders), HAMD-17 (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale), SOFAS (Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale), SF-36 (Physical PCS- and Mental -MCS- Component Summaries), and the CGI-S Et PGI-S (Clinical Global Impression for Severity of Illness scales for clinicians and patients, respectively). Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Spanish version were assessed. Results: In the validation study, 305 MDD patients (69.5% female) with a mean age (standard deviation-SD-) of 51.75(15.53) were included. Mean completion time was 4.47(2.4) minutes. Floor or ceiling effects were found in less than 1% of the case scores. Internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach's alpha= 0.88). Pearson correlation coefficients with CUDOS were: -0.42 (SOFAS), 0.45 (HAMD-17), -0.22 (PCS), -0.65 (MCS); all p<0.001. The CUDOS properly discriminated among clinical severity levels (p<0.03). Conclusions: The adapted Spanish version of the CUDOS shows adequate psychometric properties as an evaluation instrument of major depression from the patient's perspective.
710			_9150 _aServicio de Psiquiatría
856			_uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/3/pc3103.pdf _ySolicitar documento
942			_n0 _2ddc _cART
999			_c3103 _d3103