000 02661na a2200277 4500
003 H12O
005 20180417112621.0
008 130622s2012 xxx||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _cH12O
041 _aspa
100 _aBarceló Mendiguchia, Ana
_91787
_b
_eOftalmología
100 _9428
_aGutiérrez Díaz, Esperanza
_eOftalmología
100 _aMencía Gutiérrez, Enrique
_91786
_eOftalmología
100 _aTejada Palacios, Pilar
_91437
_eOftalmología
245 0 0 _aResultados a medio plazo de dispositvos de drenaje para glaucoma en pacientes pediátricos.
_h[artículo]
260 _bArchivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología,
_c2012
300 _a87(2):38-43.
500 _aFormato Vancouver: Colás-Tomás T, Gutiérrez-Díaz E, Tejada-Palacios P, Barceló-Mendiguchía A, Mencía-Gutiérrez E. Resultados a medio plazo de dispositvos de drenaje para glaucoma en pacientes pediátricos. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2012 Feb;87(2):38-43.
501 _aPMID: 22341357
504 _aContiene 19 referencias
520 _aPURPOSE: To evaluate the results and long-term complications of glaucoma drainage devices (GDD) in paediatric patients (0-15 years). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was conducted on 17 implanted glaucoma drainage devices from July 1994 to April 2007 in 14 patients (17 eyes). In two patients (3 eyes) a Molteno GDD (MGDD) was implanted, and in 12 patients (14 eyes) an Ahmed GDD (AGDD) was used. We studied the demographic and glaucoma related patient data, as well as the probability of surgical success. The time which intraocular pressure (IOP) was controlled and the postoperative complications were also studied. RESULTS: Of the fourteen patients, 9 (64.28%) showed congenital glaucoma, and 5 (35.71%) aphakic glaucoma. The pre-aqueous drainage device median IOP was 29.82 mmHg (SD: 6.98), and 14.05 mmHg (SD: 7.57) postoperative. The median follow-up was 3.14 years (3 months-8.3 years). Success of aqueous drainage device was defined as an IOP less than 21 mmHg with or without medication on the last two follow-up visits, and without severe complications or further glaucoma surgery. Using a Kaplan Meier analysis there was success in 76%, 63% and 55% at the six months, 1-3 years and 4-8 years respectively. The GDD was a failure in 41.17%. CONCLUSIONS: GDDs are a good surgery option for refractory paediatric glaucoma when other surgery procedures have failed or have bad prognosti.
710 _9223
_aServicio de Oftalmología
710 _9446
_aServicio de Pediatría-Neonatología
856 _uhttp://pc-h12o-es.m-hdoct.a17.csinet.es/pdf/pc/6/pc6939.pdf
_ySolicitar documento
942 _n0
_2ddc
_cART
999 _c6939
_d6939